Skip to content
Justilio
FRRequest a demo

For compliance teams · neobanks, BaaS, payment institutions

Every supporting document arrives pre-analysed. Your analyst only has to decide.

You send Justilio the transfer and the supporting document your customer uploaded. It reads the document and cross-checks it against the transfer, official registers and your past payments. Your analyst gets a clear status, the discrepancies found and, if something is missing, the question to ask the customer.

Request a demoSee the full report

Justilio never approves or rejects a transfer: the decision stays with your analyst.

Fictitious demo caseSuspicious

Outgoing transfer · €48,000.00

Beneficiary
Velmora Conseil
Transfer date
06/11/2026
Reference in the payment details
FACT VC-2026-014

An altered invoice between related companies

  • Suspicious Under the €48,000.00 total, the PDF still holds an earlier total of €4,800.00, hidden by a white rectangle.

  • Watch point Nordis Trading, your customer, and Velmora Conseil share an officer.

  • Watch point Velmora Conseil was registered on 17/09/2026, seven weeks before the transfer.

  • Watch point €48,000 for a company with no employees, set up less than a year ago.

  • Watch point Your customer’s first transfer to Velmora Conseil, according to the history you shared.

  • No discrepancy Amount, IBAN, SIREN, VAT, active company, asset freeze register, invoice number in the payment details.

Question for the customer

None: a suspicious case goes to your compliance team, which decides what happens next.

See the 71 checks run on an invoice →

The alteration is caught, and so is the link between the two companies.

A clear status for every case.

Consistent

Everything matches. Your analyst approves at a glance.

Incomplete

Information is missing. The question for the customer is ready.

Inconsistent

The document does not match the transfer. The discrepancy is shown, value by value.

Suspicious

Sign of fraud or serious risk. The case goes to compliance, with no question to the customer.

Understand the statuses →

Your analysts stop cross-checking. They decide.

No more manual cross-checking

Amount, IBAN, beneficiary, official registers and past payments are matched before your analyst opens the case.

A follow-up ready to send

If information is missing, the question for the customer is already written. Your analyst reviews it and sends it.

A decision you can defend

Each finding shows the value read and the value expected. Your analyst understands the status at a glance, and can explain it to an auditor months later.

What matching reveals.

The supplier’s account has changed

The invoice and the transfer show the same IBAN. The past payments you share show another account for this beneficiary. The case asks for the change to be confirmed.

An invoice has already received payments

The invoice amount is matched against the payments linked to it. Your analyst sees the known total and any overpayment.

An amount was hidden in the PDF

Some edits leave a trace: for example, an old total still present beneath a white rectangle. Any indicators detected are shown in the case.

Explore the scope of our checks →

From document received to case review.

  1. You gather the elements

    The transfer to be justified, the document uploaded by the customer and the information needed to review it.

  2. Justilio prepares the checks

    The data read is matched against the payment, the registers consulted and the available history. Discrepancies and information to confirm are flagged.

  3. Your analyst continues the review

    They read the findings, request more information if needed and make the decision.

Supporting documentTransferRegisters consultedHistory sharedExplained case
Plan the integration into your workflow →

Everything in the case stays visible.

Values to confirm are flagged

When a value read cannot be confirmed in the document, the case says so.

Findings are explained

Missing information, an inconsistency and a suspicion are presented separately.

The decision stays yours

Your team remains responsible for the review and for what happens to the transfer.

Understand the statuses →Review how data is handled →

Measure what Justilio brings to your cases.

Let’s agree on a batch of cases and the criteria that matter to your team. The pilot compares your current review with a review prepared by Justilio.

  • Preparation time
  • Follow-up requests needed
  • Alert relevance and false alerts
Discuss a pilotStart with a demo →